1872: Lunar Economy
B2 Ep. 1872 · May 28, 2026 Seg. 1:20:00 – 1:29:00
No Agenda Listening Exercises
🎧 Listen now Segment 1:20:00 – 1:29:00
← All lessons

Part 1 — Before You Listen

💡 When you're done, check your answers using the Show answers button at the bottom of the page.

About the No Agenda Show

No Agenda is a twice-weekly podcast hosted by Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak — two veteran media professionals who analyse news, politics, and media narratives. Episodes are long-form, unscripted conversations built around real clips from news broadcasts.

About this segment

In this clip, Adam and John react to a series of NBC news reports about NASA's ambitious plan to build a permanent base on the moon. They debate the cost, the science, and whether the whole project will ever actually happen.

Key context: NASA's Artemis programme has been working to return humans to the moon. In May 2026, NASA announced a phased plan to build a moon base — called "Operation Moonbase" — starting with robotic missions and working towards a permanent crewed facility by the early 2030s. The project is estimated to cost $20 billion over seven years.

Section A: Key Vocabulary

Study these words and phrases before listening.

Word / Phrase Meaning (in natural English) Example sentence
lunar economya system of business, trade, and resources based on activities on the moonScientists believe a lunar economy could develop once we start mining materials from the moon.
helium-3a rare form of helium gas found in large amounts on the moon, potentially useful as a fuel sourceHelium-3 could one day power fusion reactors, making it one of the moon's most valuable resources.
aneutronic fusiona type of nuclear fusion that produces very little or no harmful radiationHelium-3 is attractive as a fuel because it enables aneutronic fusion, meaning fewer radioactive by-products.
uncreweddescribes a spacecraft or mission that has no human crew on boardThe first phase will involve sending uncrewed robotic missions to scout the lunar surface.
autonomousable to operate independently without human controlThe rovers have autonomous capability, allowing them to navigate the moon's surface without a pilot.
psy-opa planned effort to influence people's beliefs or emotions, often through media or propagandaJohn suspects the pro-Russia social media content is a psy-op designed to change public opinion.
lease salea government auction where companies bid for the right to drill or mine on public landThe new lease sales have already brought billions of dollars into the Treasury.
enduring presencea permanent or long-lasting involvement in a place, rather than a short visitNASA's goal is to establish an enduring presence on the moon, not just a one-time landing.
micrometeoritestiny pieces of rock or metal from space that travel at high speed and can damage structuresA moon base would need protection from micrometeorites, which shower the lunar surface constantly.
propellanta substance used to power a rocket or other vehicle by creating thrustManufacturing propellant on the moon could allow future missions to travel further into space.

Section B: Predict

Before listening, write your predictions.

1. NASA says it wants to build a moon base to develop a "lunar economy". What do you think this means? What resources or activities might make the moon economically valuable?

2. Do you think spending $20 billion on a moon base is a good use of public money? What arguments might people make for and against?

3. Adam and John are known for being sceptical of mainstream media. How do you think they will react to an official NASA press briefing?

Part 2 — While You Listen

Section A: First Listening — Main Ideas

Listen once and choose the best answer.

1. What is NASA's stated main long-term goal beyond building a moon base?

To mine helium-3 and sell it to other countries
To send astronauts to Mars
To replace the International Space Station

2. How does John Dvorak respond to NASA's plans?

He is enthusiastic and thinks they are achievable
He is sceptical and predicts very little will happen on schedule
He agrees with the plan but thinks $20 billion is too little money

3. According to the "Book of Knowledge", what is the current main use of helium-3 on Earth?

Powering nuclear fusion reactors
Filling party balloons
Security screening and neutron detection

4. What does Adam Curry compare NASA's $20 billion budget to?

The cost of the International Space Station
California's high-speed rail project
Trump's tax cut legislation

Section B: Second Listening — Details

Listen again and answer with specific information from the clip.

  1. According to NASA, in what year are astronauts expected to first begin living and working on the moon?

  2. What are the two main dangers or risks that a moon base would need to deal with? Name both.

  3. What does John say about the Artemis 4 mission? What does he predict will happen?

  4. Why does the NASA administrator say manufacturing propellant on the moon is important for a future Mars mission?

Background: The Artemis Programme

Artemis is NASA's programme to return humans to the moon for the first time since Apollo 17 in 1972. Artemis II (mentioned in the clip) sent four astronauts around the moon in early 2026 without landing. Artemis III is intended to be the first crewed lunar landing. Artemis IV would follow with more complex surface missions.

The "South Pole" of the moon is a target because it contains water ice in permanently shadowed craters. This ice could be converted into drinking water and rocket propellant.

Part 3 — Vocabulary in Context

Section A: Fill in the Gaps

Use the words from the word bank to complete the sentences. Change the form of the word if needed.

Word Bank
  1. The first phase of the mission will use __________________ rovers to map the terrain before any astronauts arrive.
  2. Scientists believe __________________ could be extracted from the lunar surface and used as fuel for fusion reactors.
  3. The government has been holding __________________ on public lands, raising billions for the Treasury.
  4. Without enough __________________, the rocket would never be able to leave the moon's surface.
  5. NASA's ultimate ambition is to establish an __________________ human presence on the moon, not just a series of short visits.
  6. The __________________ spacecraft carried no crew — only sensors and a small robotic arm.
  7. The base's outer walls were reinforced to protect against __________________, which strike at enormous speed.
  8. If the concept of a __________________ ever becomes reality, the moon could become the next frontier for international business.

Section B: Language Focus — Hedging and Certainty

What is hedging language?

In the clip, speakers use hedging language — words and phrases that soften claims and show uncertainty. Compare these examples from the segment:

Original (hedged)

"I suspect we'll see a growth in their oil imports."

Unhedged version

"We will see a growth in their oil imports."

The hedged version sounds more honest and professional. It shows the speaker is aware they might be wrong. You will hear this constantly in academic, political, and business English.

Rewrite these sentences to make them sound more cautious. Use the word(s) in brackets.

1. "Helium-3 will revolutionise global energy production." (might)

2. "Building a moon base is the right thing to do." (could argue)

3. "The Artemis 4 mission will be delayed." (I suspect / likely)

Discussion question: Why do politicians and scientists often use hedging language in public speeches? Is it a sign of honesty or weakness? Give your opinion with an example.

Part 4 — Discussion

Discuss these questions with a partner or small group. Use evidence from the clip and your own ideas.

Question 1
Adam says: "Give me $3 gas. Then we can talk about moon stuff." What does this tell us about how he weighs immediate everyday problems against long-term scientific ambitions? Do you agree with his priorities?
💬 To help you start:
  • I think Adam's point suggests that...
  • One could argue that investing in space exploration is actually...
  • The tension between short-term needs and long-term goals is similar to...
Question 2
The NASA administrator says he wants to develop the "scientific and economic potential" of the moon. John immediately asks: "What is it? I have no idea." Do you think it is fair to spend public money on a project whose economic benefits are still unclear?
💬 To help you start:
  • A strong argument in favour of spending public money here is...
  • On the other hand, critics like John might say...
  • I think the key question is whether...
Question 3
John predicts the moon base plans will come to nothing — he expects delays, failed robots, and no real progress. Is healthy scepticism about big government projects useful, or does it make it harder to achieve ambitious goals?
💬 To help you start:
  • Scepticism can be valuable because...
  • However, without a degree of optimism, societies might never...
  • History gives us examples of both — for instance...
Question 4
Adam and John joke that NASA chose a weak name: "Operation Moonbase". How important is the way a project is named and communicated to the public when it comes to winning support? Can you think of examples where branding or storytelling made a real difference?
💬 To help you start:
  • The name of a project matters because...
  • A good example of powerful branding in history or politics is...
  • Compared to NASA's choice, a more effective approach might have been...
Question 5
Near the end of the clip, Adam suggests that if we can manufacture propellant on the moon, it could be a stepping stone to Mars. Should reaching Mars be seen as a priority for humanity? Who should pay for it — governments, private companies, or a combination?
💬 To help you start:
  • I believe reaching Mars is / is not a priority because...
  • The argument for government funding is that...
  • The case for private companies leading this effort is...

Part 5 — Writing Task (Optional)

Choose ONE task — write 150–200 words

Task A — Report

Write a short factual summary of NASA's moon base plans as if you were writing a news article. Include: what the plan is, the timeline, the cost, and the main goal.

Task B — Opinion

Do you think your country should contribute to an international moon base project? Write a short opinion piece giving your view with at least two supporting reasons.

Task C — Analysis

Compare the way Adam and John discuss the moon base to how the NBC journalist presents it. What differences do you notice in tone, vocabulary, and the assumptions each side makes about the audience?

Answer Key

Part 2A — Multiple Choice

1.b) To send astronauts to Mars
2.b) He is sceptical and predicts very little will happen on schedule
3.c) Security screening and neutron detection (nearly 80% of current helium-3 use)
4.b) California's high-speed rail project ($120 billion, with not one inch of track laid)

Part 2B — Details

1.2032
2.Long-term radiation exposure and micrometeorites
3.John predicts Artemis 4 will blow up / there will be a fatal accident, or nothing will happen at all — the plans will just be talked about and delayed
4.The moon is only 4–5 days from Earth, so astronauts can practise making propellant there before attempting a Mars mission, where they would be 9 months away and unable to get help

Part 3A — Fill in the Gaps

1.autonomous
2.helium-3
3.lease sales
4.propellant
5.enduring
6.uncrewed
7.micrometeorites
8.lunar economy

Part 3B — Hedging Rewrites (sample answers)

1.Helium-3 might revolutionise global energy production.
2.One could argue that building a moon base is the right thing to do.
3.I suspect the Artemis 4 mission is likely to be delayed. / The Artemis 4 mission will likely be delayed.

About the No Agenda Show ↗

"The No Agenda Show is my go‑to recommendation for learners who want real, unfiltered English at B2 CEFR level and above. It's fast, funny, politically incorrect at times, and exactly the kind of authentic listening that challenges serious adult learners to think in English, not just 'practice' it."

What the show is

A twice‑weekly, long‑form podcast hosted by Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak — two veteran media professionals who spend each episode deconstructing news, politics, and media narratives from around the world.

Why it's "authentic" English

Unlike graded ESL materials, No Agenda gives you the kind of spoken English professionals actually use when thinking out loud, disagreeing, joking, and negotiating meaning in real time.

Ad‑free & unconstrained

No Agenda runs entirely on a listener‑supported "value‑for‑value" model. Because there are no corporate sponsors, John and Adam have the freedom to say what they actually think.

Why it suits B2+ learners

The show moves quickly, jumps between topics, and assumes you can follow complex arguments. For motivated learners, this is exactly the "productive difficulty" that builds real-world listening stamina.